Evolving Open Solutions (2)
AbstractAre the scholarly publishing tools weâ€™re using today still the right ones? Is the monograph still the best format in the humanities? Is the journal article still best in STM? These products can be difficult to produce and edit, nearly impenetrable to read, andâ€”as in the case of clinical research informationâ€”they arenâ€™t necessarily the best-suited formats for capturing every piece of necessary information (like protocols and datasets in medical research) and showing how this information is all connected to other scholarship. What other formats and options are being considered or used? What are the prospects of change? How about the stakeholder universe itself? How are roles, responsibilities and expectations changing (and where might they end up)? Are we â€œsettlingâ€ on half-measures or on the best possible solutions?
Copyright (c) 2016 Marilyn Billings, Brett Bobley, Aaron McCollough, Alison Mudditt, Kamran Naim, Frances Pinter, Richard Price, Tony Roche, Lisa Sprio, Micah Vandegrift
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.