Report from the Evolving Open Solutions (2) Workgroup
AbstractAre the scholarly publishing tools weâre using today still the right ones? Is the monograph still the best format in the humanities? Is the journal article still best in STM? These products can be difficult to produce and edit, nearly impenetrable to read, andâas in the case of clini-cal research informationâthey arenât necessarily the best-suited formats for capturing every piece of necessary information (like protocols and datasets in medical research) and showing how this information is all connected to other scholarship. What other formats and options are being considered or used? What are the prospects of change? How about the stakeholder universe itself? How are roles, responsibilities and expectations changing (and where might they end up)? Are we âsettlingâ on half-measures or on the best possible solutions?
Copyright (c) 2016 OSI2016 Evolving Open Solutions (2) Workgroup
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.