Evaluating the Viability of Saliva-based Sampling in COVID-19 Diagnostic Tests Compared to Nasopharyngeal (NP) and Oropharyngeal Swabs (OP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13021/jssr2021.3266Abstract
School of Systems Biology, College of Science, George Mason University When treating COVID-19, detecting the virus early on and isolating the infected patients play an important role in controlling the outbreak as it has infected almost 200 million people with over 4 million deaths worldwide. In addition, limiting viral exposure to healthcare workers is a major priority. Currently, nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs are utilized the most for diagnostic tests. However, both swabs require the use of an RT-qPCR test, which needs advanced laboratory equipment, limiting the accessibility of tests. The purpose of this study is to determine whether saliva is a viable sample for diagnosing COVID-19 as it allows for quick, accessible self-performed tests. This was done by comparing NP + OP swab samples/other common sampling methods with saliva samples through Point of Care, RT-PCR, and Serological COVID-19 diagnostic tests for detection rate, sensitivity and other parameters. NP swabs and saliva contained similar viral loads as they were positively correlated (r = 0.8029), but saliva samples maintained their viral load for 7 days while the NP swabs did not. Saliva samples also had higher detection rates (92.3% vs. 73.8%) and sensitivity (95.0% vs. 72.2%) than NP + OP swab samples through the RT-qPCR diagnostic test. Further study and research is needed to solidify the accuracy of the use of saliva for testing, but it is still an alternative to the NP+OP swab detection due to its greater sensitivity and higher detection rate.
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 JASMINE LAOUDI, Dr. Fatah Kashanchi, Mahla Dehbandi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.