Report from the Usage Dimensions of Open Workgroup
The Usage Dimensions of Open workgroup came together and considered definitions and priorities around its topic. From priorities, themes were identified. One theme included the character of research outputs and the actual research workflow process. The second theme represented economic considerations. Stakeholders were identified, and solutions considÃÂered. Solutions included both short- and long-term actions.OSI2016 Workgroup Question
What are the usage-related challenges currently faced by open efforts? For instance, open data is intriguing in principle, but in reality, making underlying data open can be problematic, conÃÂflicting with the need for research secrecy (whether driven by the desire to be first to publish, or the desire of funders to hold onto data to protect future discovery potential), the potential for misinterpretation by other researchers, and so on. Publishing clinical trial data in open formats is also intriguing but would run afoul of many current consent agreements, particularly older consents. Open access is similarly challenged in some instances by a conÃÂflict between which versions of papers is allowed to appear in open repositories. What is the value of archiving non-final versions? What is the range of issues here, what are the perspecÃÂtives, and what might be some possible solutions?
Copyright (c) 2016 OSI2016 Usage Dimensions of Open workgroup
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.