Splitting Group Assignments for Individual Accountability

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13021/G8itlcp.10.2018.2167

Keywords:

team-based learning, active learning classrooms

Abstract

NOTE: This teaching activity showcase is one of two during the 1:00pm-2:30pm session. àIt will be presented within that session from 1:50pm to 2:30pm.

BRIEF SESSION DESCRIPTION:

Group work is often divided into pieces, with each student doing the part with which they are most comfortable. Doing so, however, may limit the depth to which students learn new information and their willingness to take up on new challenges. To help overcome this issue, we tried splitting a traditional group activity into two parts. We describe a case, the two assignment parts, and how it impacted the course and student engagement. This approach may also be useful for hybrid or flipped courses.àParticipants will be able to reflect on their own assignments, particularly group ones, and look for opportunities to develop multi-part assignments to better engage students and to foster reflection or further analysis.à

______________________________________________________________

FULL ABSTRACT:

Group work is often divided into pieces, with each student doing the portion with which they are already familiar or most comfortable. Doing so, however, may limit the depth to which students learn new information and their willingness to take on new challenges. To help overcome this issue, we tried splitting a traditional group activity into two parts. The MBA program uses cases to illustrate concepts in practice and allows students to place themselves in the role of a manager needing to make a decision. The decision often requires both quantitative and qualitative analysis. Historically, cases have been assigned as a single group assignment, with students given a set of guiding questions. We have instead split the assignment into two parts. The first part is individual and asks each student to do and turn in the quantitative analysis. We then discuss that analysis and the decision makerââ¬â¢s options in class. The students then do the second part in their groups. They are asked to review the quantitative analysis and discuss the decision makerââ¬â¢s options with their groups. Then the group writes an executive summary with their recommendation for a decision/course of action and must defend it with both quantitative and qualitative analysis. We will describe a case, the two assignment parts, and how it impacted the course and student engagement.

Author Biographies

Cheryl Druehl, George Mason University

Information Systems and Operations Managment,àAssociate Professor

Ioannis Bellos, George Mason University

Information Systems and Operations Management

Published

2018-08-08

Issue

Section

1:50pm-2:30pm Mini-Workshops, Panels, & Roundtables